<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: foomonger-swizframework Updated With Swiz 1.0.0 RC1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.foomonger.com/2010/05/23/foomonger-swizframework-updated-with-swiz-1-0-0-rc1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.foomonger.com/2010/05/23/foomonger-swizframework-updated-with-swiz-1-0-0-rc1/</link>
	<description>Tips and Musings on Software Development, Flash, and Flex</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:27:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Ahn</title>
		<link>http://blog.foomonger.com/2010/05/23/foomonger-swizframework-updated-with-swiz-1-0-0-rc1/comment-page-1/#comment-2310</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Ahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foomonger.com/?p=164#comment-2310</guid>
		<description>Google translated previous comment:
Why do you want to open foomonger-swizframework item?
Why not feature in the submitted to the swizframework go?

Rephrase:
Why haven&#039;t I submitted these custom processors to be included within Swiz?

Good question. There is an answer for each custom processor.

[Logger]
This one is so simple I don&#039;t think it&#039;s worth it. I could also see people wanting to use their own [Logger] to create non SwizLogger logger instances. Hmm, that might not translate well.

[MediateSignal] aka [SignalHandler] and [Resource]
These have dependencies on other frameworks (AS3Signals and Flex), and I don&#039;t think Swiz should/wants to have those dependencies.

I really like the leanness of Swiz and hope it continues to stay that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google translated previous comment:<br />
Why do you want to open foomonger-swizframework item?<br />
Why not feature in the submitted to the swizframework go?</p>
<p>Rephrase:<br />
Why haven&#8217;t I submitted these custom processors to be included within Swiz?</p>
<p>Good question. There is an answer for each custom processor.</p>
<p>[Logger]<br />
This one is so simple I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth it. I could also see people wanting to use their own [Logger] to create non SwizLogger logger instances. Hmm, that might not translate well.</p>
<p>[MediateSignal] aka [SignalHandler] and [Resource]<br />
These have dependencies on other frameworks (AS3Signals and Flex), and I don&#8217;t think Swiz should/wants to have those dependencies.</p>
<p>I really like the leanness of Swiz and hope it continues to stay that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zzp</title>
		<link>http://blog.foomonger.com/2010/05/23/foomonger-swizframework-updated-with-swiz-1-0-0-rc1/comment-page-1/#comment-2308</link>
		<dc:creator>zzp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foomonger.com/?p=164#comment-2308</guid>
		<description>你为什么要新开foomonger-swizframework项目呢？ 
为什么不把功能提交到swizframework中去呢？</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>你为什么要新开foomonger-swizframework项目呢？<br />
为什么不把功能提交到swizframework中去呢？</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

