<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SwizLogger Helpers: SwizLoggerConfig and LoggerProcessor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.foomonger.com/2010/03/20/swizlogger-helpers-swizloggerconfig-and-loggerprocessor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.foomonger.com/2010/03/20/swizlogger-helpers-swizloggerconfig-and-loggerprocessor/</link>
	<description>Tips and Musings on Software Development, Flash, and Flex</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:27:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Ahn</title>
		<link>http://blog.foomonger.com/2010/03/20/swizlogger-helpers-swizloggerconfig-and-loggerprocessor/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Ahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foomonger.com/?p=142#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Wow, I totally missed that. And I&#039;m the guy that thinks programmers need to read more code and docs. Thanks for pointing it out.

My first thought is that it makes more sense in SwizConfig. Though part of me thinks it shouldn&#039;t be in there at all because logging targets don&#039;t modify the Swiz instance. Then again it&#039;s more for convenience and having it in Swiz/SwizConfig means one less object.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I totally missed that. And I&#8217;m the guy that thinks programmers need to read more code and docs. Thanks for pointing it out.</p>
<p>My first thought is that it makes more sense in SwizConfig. Though part of me thinks it shouldn&#8217;t be in there at all because logging targets don&#8217;t modify the Swiz instance. Then again it&#8217;s more for convenience and having it in Swiz/SwizConfig means one less object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Clinkinbeard</title>
		<link>http://blog.foomonger.com/2010/03/20/swizlogger-helpers-swizloggerconfig-and-loggerprocessor/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Clinkinbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foomonger.com/?p=142#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Hey Sam,

Great work as always. We actually have a loggingTargets property on Swiz itself, did you notice that? Maybe it makes more sense on SwizConfig?

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sam,</p>
<p>Great work as always. We actually have a loggingTargets property on Swiz itself, did you notice that? Maybe it makes more sense on SwizConfig?</p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

